Covered clinical trials

Follow the trial. Keep the conclusion separate.

Browse 60 unique registry records connected to 45 of our 55 released stories. This is a publication-maintained reading aid—not every longevity trial, a recommendation, or a registry operated by the government.

Find a covered trial

Filter without ranking

60 of 60 registry records shown

LiFE reduced self-reported falls by embedding activity in daily routines

Lifestyle integrated Functional Exercise (LiFE) — ACTRN12606000025538

ACTRN12606000025538

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusUnknownChecked 2026-08-26
Results availabilityNot assessedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
317 ambulatory community-living adults age 70 years or older with recurrent or injurious falls
Intervention and comparator
three-arm randomized parallel trial with fall calendars over 12 months; structured exercise and sham gentle exercise
Measured outcome
self-reported fall rate
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

LiFE reduced self-reported falls by embedding activity in daily routines

Measured outcome: self-reported fall rate

Released evidence conclusion: Fall rates were 1.66, 1.90 and 2.28 per person-year; LiFE versus control IRR 0.69 (95% CI 0.48–0.99).

Does not establish: The trial did not establish fewer fractures, disability, longer healthspan or lifespan, and it does not test unsupervised use in other populations.

Registry link checked · projected from eighteenth-coverage-claim-map.json

PREDIMED found fewer cardiovascular events after a Mediterranean-style diet—with a correction history

Mediterranean diet — ISRCTN35739639

ISRCTN35739639

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusUnknownChecked 2026-07-31
Results availabilityNot assessedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
7,447 adults age 55–80 in Spain at high cardiovascular risk, without cardiovascular disease at enrollment
Intervention and comparator
corrected randomized trial
Measured outcome
myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

PREDIMED found fewer cardiovascular events after a Mediterranean-style diet—with a correction history

Measured outcome: myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death

Released evidence conclusion: The corrected randomized analysis is promising for its composite endpoint, while allocation deviations and lifespan limits remain visible.

Does not establish: The trial cannot identify which food or behavior caused the difference, show benefit in every population, or establish that the program slows biological aging. A reduction in a cardiovascular composite does not prove longer life; all-cause mortality did not show a clear difference. The interventions also included counseling and free olive oil or nuts, so the result is not evidence for any product carrying a “Mediterranean” label.

Registry link checked · projected from third-coverage-edition.json

Menopausal hormone therapy treats symptoms. WHI did not show a longevity benefit

menopausal hormone therapy — NCT00000611

NCT00000611

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Postmenopausal women age 50–79, separated by uterus status and hormone regimen
Intervention and comparator
randomized trials
Measured outcome
disease events, breast cancer and all-cause mortality
Funding and conflicts
NIH/NHLBI sponsored the WHI hormone trials; Wyeth-Ayerst donated study drugs. Regimen-specific disclosures remain visible.

Why this story is connected

Menopausal hormone therapy treats symptoms. WHI did not show a longevity benefit

Measured outcome: disease events, breast cancer and all-cause mortality

Released evidence conclusion: WHI found a formulation-specific mix of benefits and harms, no overall 18-year mortality difference, and no basis for general longevity prevention.

Does not establish: WHI does not show that hormone therapy generally reverses aging, prevents chronic disease, or extends lifespan. It also does not erase the recognized role of individualized symptom treatment. Symptom benefit and prevention evidence answer different questions.

Registry link checked · projected from ninth-coverage-edition.json

ACCORD’s intensive glucose target increased mortality and was stopped early

intensive multi-drug glycemia strategy targeting HbA1c below 6% — NCT00000620

NCT00000620

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-26
Results availabilityNot assessedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
10,251 adults with established type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk
Intervention and comparator
intensive glycemia target below 6% versus standard target of 7.0% to 7.9%
Measured outcome
major cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality and treatment harms
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

ACCORD’s intensive glucose target increased mortality and was stopped early

Measured outcome: major cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality and treatment harms

Released evidence conclusion: The primary cardiovascular outcome was not significantly lower (352 versus 371 events; hazard ratio 0.90; P=0.16). Deaths were higher with intensive treatment (257 versus 203; hazard ratio 1.22; P=0.04), prompting early discontinuation.

Does not establish: ACCORD does not show that all glucose lowering is harmful; it tested one intensive, multi-drug target strategy in a high-risk population.

Registry link checked · projected from seventeenth-coverage-claim-map.json

DPP prevention effects persisted for 15 years—without an overall microvascular difference

intensive lifestyle or metformin for diabetes prevention — NCT00004992

NCT00004992

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-26
Results availabilityNot assessedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
2,776 surviving DPP participants with elevated glucose and overweight or obesity who joined long-term follow-up
Intervention and comparator
randomized lifestyle or metformin versus placebo, followed observationally after the original trial
Measured outcome
cumulative type 2 diabetes incidence and aggregate microvascular disease
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

DPP prevention effects persisted for 15 years—without an overall microvascular difference

Measured outcome: cumulative type 2 diabetes incidence and aggregate microvascular disease

Released evidence conclusion: Over 15 years, cumulative diabetes incidence was 55% with intensive lifestyle, 56% with metformin and 62% with placebo. The randomized groups did not differ significantly in aggregate microvascular prevalence.

Does not establish: The follow-up did not demonstrate that either randomized assignment reduced the aggregate microvascular outcome or extended life.

Registry link checked · projected from seventeenth-coverage-claim-map.json

Look AHEAD improved weight and risk factors—not cardiovascular event rates

intensive lifestyle intervention for weight loss and physical activity — NCT00017953

NCT00017953

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-26
Results availabilityNot assessedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
5,145 adults age 45–75 with type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity
Intervention and comparator
intensive lifestyle intervention versus diabetes support and education
Measured outcome
major cardiovascular events, weight and cardiometabolic risk factors
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

Look AHEAD improved weight and risk factors—not cardiovascular event rates

Measured outcome: major cardiovascular events, weight and cardiometabolic risk factors

Released evidence conclusion: The primary cardiovascular outcome occurred in 403 intensive-lifestyle participants and 418 controls (hazard ratio 0.95; P=0.51). Weight loss and several risk factors improved more with intensive lifestyle.

Does not establish: Look AHEAD did not establish that its intensive lifestyle program reduced major cardiovascular events or extended life in this population.

Registry link checked · projected from seventeenth-coverage-claim-map.json

DPP prevention effects persisted for 15 years—without an overall microvascular difference

intensive lifestyle or metformin for diabetes prevention — NCT00038727

NCT00038727

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusActive, not recruitingChecked 2026-08-27
Results availabilityNot assessedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phasephase 3Unknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
2,776 surviving DPP participants with elevated glucose and overweight or obesity who joined long-term follow-up
Intervention and comparator
randomized lifestyle or metformin versus placebo, followed observationally after the original trial
Measured outcome
cumulative type 2 diabetes incidence and aggregate microvascular disease
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

DPP prevention effects persisted for 15 years—without an overall microvascular difference

Measured outcome: cumulative type 2 diabetes incidence and aggregate microvascular disease

Released evidence conclusion: Over 15 years, cumulative diabetes incidence was 55% with intensive lifestyle, 56% with metformin and 62% with placebo. The randomized groups did not differ significantly in aggregate microvascular prevalence.

Does not establish: The follow-up did not demonstrate that either randomized assignment reduced the aggregate microvascular outcome or extended life.

Registry link checked · projected from seventeenth-coverage-claim-map.json

Zoledronic acid reduced fractures in osteoporosis—not aging itself

zoledronic acid — NCT00049829

NCT00049829

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
7,765 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis; mean age about 73
Intervention and comparator
large randomized trial
Measured outcome
vertebral, hip and nonvertebral fractures plus bone density
Funding and conflicts
Novartis sponsored HORIZON, with company involvement and author relationships disclosed in the primary reports.

Why this story is connected

Zoledronic acid reduced fractures in osteoporosis—not aging itself

Measured outcome: vertebral, hip and nonvertebral fractures plus bone density

Released evidence conclusion: HORIZON reduced vertebral and hip fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis, with outcome-specific duration and safety limits—not evidence of slower aging.

Does not establish: HORIZON does not show that zoledronic acid slows biological aging, extends life, or should be used by low-risk adults. It also does not provide an individualized duration: the extension reduced morphometric vertebral fractures but did not significantly change hip, nonvertebral, clinical vertebral or all-clinical fractures.

Registry link checked · projected from ninth-coverage-edition.json

Zoledronic acid reduced fractures in osteoporosis—not aging itself

zoledronic acid — NCT00145327

NCT00145327

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
7,765 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis; mean age about 73
Intervention and comparator
large randomized trial
Measured outcome
vertebral, hip and nonvertebral fractures plus bone density
Funding and conflicts
Novartis sponsored HORIZON, with company involvement and author relationships disclosed in the primary reports.

Why this story is connected

Zoledronic acid reduced fractures in osteoporosis—not aging itself

Measured outcome: vertebral, hip and nonvertebral fractures plus bone density

Released evidence conclusion: HORIZON reduced vertebral and hip fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis, with outcome-specific duration and safety limits—not evidence of slower aging.

Does not establish: HORIZON does not show that zoledronic acid slows biological aging, extends life, or should be used by low-risk adults. It also does not provide an individualized duration: the extension reduced morphometric vertebral fractures but did not significantly change hip, nonvertebral, clinical vertebral or all-clinical fractures.

Registry link checked · projected from ninth-coverage-edition.json

CBT-I improves later-life insomnia—not aging itself

CBT-I — NCT00280020

NCT00280020

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusUnknownChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
46 adults in one insomnia trial and 123 older adults in a separate late-life trial
Intervention and comparator
randomized behavioral trials
Measured outcome
sleep latency, sleep efficiency, insomnia remission and durability
Funding and conflicts
The featured CBT-I trials reported public or academic support; the evidence does not establish dementia prevention or longer life.

Why this story is connected

CBT-I improves later-life insomnia—not aging itself

Measured outcome: sleep latency, sleep efficiency, insomnia remission and durability

Released evidence conclusion: Two randomized trials support meaningful sleep improvement in older adults; they did not test dementia prevention, biological aging or lifespan.

Does not establish: The trials do not show that CBT-I reverses biological aging, prevents dementia, reduces mortality or extends lifespan. Observational links between sleep and health cannot fill in endpoints the trials never measured.

Registry link checked · projected from eleventh-coverage-edition.json

CBT-I improves later-life insomnia—not aging itself

CBT-I — NCT00295386

NCT00295386

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
46 adults in one insomnia trial and 123 older adults in a separate late-life trial
Intervention and comparator
randomized behavioral trials
Measured outcome
sleep latency, sleep efficiency, insomnia remission and durability
Funding and conflicts
The featured CBT-I trials reported public or academic support; the evidence does not establish dementia prevention or longer life.

Why this story is connected

CBT-I improves later-life insomnia—not aging itself

Measured outcome: sleep latency, sleep efficiency, insomnia remission and durability

Released evidence conclusion: Two randomized trials support meaningful sleep improvement in older adults; they did not test dementia prevention, biological aging or lifespan.

Does not establish: The trials do not show that CBT-I reverses biological aging, prevents dementia, reduces mortality or extends lifespan. Observational links between sleep and health cannot fill in endpoints the trials never measured.

Registry link checked · projected from eleventh-coverage-edition.json

Cognitive training improved practiced skills—not survival or proven dementia prevention

cognitive training — NCT00298558

NCT00298558

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
2,832 independent U.S. adults age 65–94
Intervention and comparator
randomized trial plus disputed secondary analysis
Measured outcome
trained abilities, daily function, all-cause mortality and claims-diagnosed dementia
Funding and conflicts
NIH-supported trial and follow-ups; the 20-year mortality report declared no conflicts, while commercial descendants are not evidence for the studied protocol.

Why this story is connected

Cognitive training improved practiced skills—not survival or proven dementia prevention

Measured outcome: trained abilities, daily function, all-cause mortality and claims-diagnosed dementia

Released evidence conclusion: ACTIVE supports trained-ability gains and some function signals, found no mortality benefit, and leaves a claims-based dementia subgroup methodologically disputed.

Does not establish: ACTIVE does not establish that generic brain games prevent dementia, extend life, or rejuvenate the brain. It does not show that the booster subgroup difference was caused by boosters rather than post-randomization selection or other differences.

Registry link checked · projected from eighth-coverage-edition.json

Melatonin can shift sleep outcomes—not human aging

melatonin — NCT00397189

NCT00397189

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
791 adults in one age-effects trial; 354 adults age 55–80 in a separate insomnia trial
Intervention and comparator
product-specific randomized trials
Measured outcome
sleep latency, sleep quality and morning alertness
Funding and conflicts
The featured prolonged-release melatonin trial was funded by Neurim; several authors disclosed employee, consultant, owner or leadership roles. Product formulation and jurisdiction matter.

Why this story is connected

Melatonin can shift sleep outcomes—not human aging

Measured outcome: sleep latency, sleep quality and morning alertness

Released evidence conclusion: Specific prolonged-release melatonin trials reported modest sleep benefits; they did not test biological-age reversal, healthspan or lifespan.

Does not establish: These studies do not show that melatonin reverses biological age, prevents age-related disease, improves healthspan or extends lifespan. Mechanistic and animal findings cannot supply missing human outcomes.

Registry link checked · projected from eleventh-coverage-edition.json

CALERIE tested calorie restriction for two years—not human lifespan

calorie restriction — NCT00427193

NCT00427193

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusUnknownChecked 2026-07-31
Results availabilityNot assessedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
218 healthy, non-obese adults age 21–51
Intervention and comparator
randomized trial
Measured outcome
metabolism, cardiometabolic risk factors and DNA-methylation biomarkers
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

CALERIE tested calorie restriction for two years—not human lifespan

Measured outcome: metabolism, cardiometabolic risk factors and DNA-methylation biomarkers

Released evidence conclusion: A randomized trial found selected cardiometabolic improvements, while aging-biomarker results were mixed and lifespan was not measured.

Does not establish: CALERIE did not test mortality or lifespan and cannot show that restriction delays every disease, benefits older or frail adults, or is safe for everyone. It does not prove that changing DunedinPACE changes clinical outcomes. Findings from laboratory animals cannot fill those human-outcome gaps.

Registry link checked · projected from second-coverage-edition.json

CPAP improved symptoms—not cardiovascular events in major trials

CPAP — NCT00738179

NCT00738179

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
2,717 adults with sleep apnea and cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease; 1,264 non-sleepy adults after acute coronary syndrome
Intervention and comparator
large randomized trials
Measured outcome
major cardiovascular events, sleepiness, symptoms and quality of life
Funding and conflicts
SAVE reported support from public agencies and Philips Respironics; ISAACC reported public and industry support. Treatment adherence and selected populations limit inference.

Why this story is connected

CPAP improved symptoms—not cardiovascular events in major trials

Measured outcome: major cardiovascular events, sleepiness, symptoms and quality of life

Released evidence conclusion: SAVE and ISAACC did not significantly reduce their primary cardiovascular outcomes; SAVE separately found symptom and quality-of-life benefits.

Does not establish: The trials do not show that CPAP is useless, that diagnosed OSA should go untreated, or that every cardiovascular subgroup has the same result. They also do not establish longer life or slower biological aging.

Registry link checked · projected from eleventh-coverage-edition.json

Testosterone did not prevent fractures in TRAVERSE

testosterone — NCT00799617

NCT00799617

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-03
Results availabilityRegistry results postedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
5,204 TRAVERSE participants: middle-aged and older men with symptoms, repeatedly low testosterone and preexisting or high cardiovascular risk
Intervention and comparator
randomized trials
Measured outcome
clinical fractures and bone-density measures
Funding and conflicts
TRAVERSE was an FDA-required postmarketing trial funded by an industry consortium led by AbbVie; sponsor and investigator roles require visible disclosure. The Testosterone Trials were principally publicly supported, with study product and additional support disclosed by investigators; the trials were not large or long enough for broad safety conclusions.

Why these stories are connected

Testosterone did not prevent fractures in TRAVERSE

Measured outcome: clinical fractures and bone-density measures

Released evidence conclusion: Clinical fractures were more frequent with testosterone than placebo in TRAVERSE; a smaller substudy’s bone-density gain cannot substitute for fracture outcomes.

Does not establish: The analysis does not establish why fractures were higher, identify a causal pathway, or show the same result for every formulation and population. It does not erase appropriate treatment for diagnosed conditions or provide an individual risk estimate.

Testosterone’s walking result was modest—not an anti-aging effect

Measured outcome: six-minute walking distance and a 50-meter improvement threshold

Released evidence conclusion: The prespecified Physical Function Trial threshold was not significant in its enrolled subgroup; broader secondary walking results do not establish disability prevention, healthspan or longevity.

Does not establish: The trials do not establish frailty reversal, prevention of mobility disability, dementia prevention, slower biological aging, healthspan extension or lifespan extension. Results do not automatically apply to younger men, men without symptoms and repeated low values, or other formulations and dosing patterns.

Registry link checked · projected from twelfth-coverage-edition.json

ASPREE did not lower cardiovascular events—and increased major bleeding

low-dose aspirin — NCT01038583

NCT01038583

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-03
Results availabilityRegistry results postedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
19,114 community-dwelling older adults without cardiovascular disease at enrollment
Intervention and comparator
large randomized trial
Measured outcome
cardiovascular events · major bleeding
Funding and conflicts
ASPREE was supported by US and Australian public/institutional funders; Bayer supplied aspirin and matching placebo in kind and was reported to have no other trial role. The 2026 follow-up discloses author grants and several outside pharmaceutical relationships.

Why these stories are connected

ASPREE did not lower cardiovascular events—and increased major bleeding

Measured outcome: cardiovascular events · major bleeding

Released evidence conclusion: In selected older adults without cardiovascular disease, low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the trial’s cardiovascular composite. Major hemorrhage occurred more often.

Does not establish: A confidence interval crossing 1 is not proof of zero possible cardiovascular effect. Nor can ASPREE be generalized to people with prior heart attack, stroke or established vascular disease, who were outside its prevention setting.

ASPREE found no gain in disability-free survival—and more major bleeding

Measured outcome: disability-free survival · major bleeding

Released evidence conclusion: In 19,114 selected older adults, daily low-dose aspirin did not improve the trial’s composite of death, dementia or persistent physical disability over a median 4.7 years. Major hemorrhage was higher.

Does not establish: The result does not prove aspirin has zero effect in every group, erase individual components, or apply to people with established cardiovascular disease. Disability-free survival is not a direct lifespan measure.

ASPREE’s cancer signal changed across longer follow-up

Measured outcome: cancer mortality · long-term follow-up

Released evidence conclusion: The randomized trial found an unexpected cancer-mortality imbalance. Longer follow-up found no difference in overall cancer incidence and no post-trial mortality legacy effect.

Does not establish: The studies do not establish that aspirin broadly causes cancer, prevents cancer, or changes lifespan for every older adult. Cancer incidence is not cancer mortality, and a post-trial null legacy association does not erase the randomized-period signal.

Registry link checked · projected from thirteenth-coverage-edition.json

FINGER slightly improved cognitive-test scores. It did not prove dementia prevention

FINGER — NCT01041989

NCT01041989

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
1,260 Finnish adults age 60–77 at elevated dementia risk and with average-to-lower cognitive performance
Intervention and comparator
randomized multidomain trial
Measured outcome
global cognitive composite and domain tests
Funding and conflicts
Public and nonprofit research funding; the primary report lists investigator disclosures and does not establish an intervention-component sponsor effect.

Why this story is connected

FINGER slightly improved cognitive-test scores. It did not prove dementia prevention

Measured outcome: global cognitive composite and domain tests

Released evidence conclusion: A combined two-year program produced a small cognitive-test advantage; it cannot identify a winning component or establish dementia, disability, mortality, healthspan, or lifespan benefit.

Does not establish: FINGER does not show which component works best, that the program prevents dementia or disability, or that it reduces death or extends healthspan or lifespan. It also does not establish that a simplified commercial program would reproduce the protocol.

Registry link checked · projected from eighth-coverage-edition.json

Creatine added to resistance training may improve some strength measures—not longevity

creatine — NCT01057680

NCT01057680

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Middle-aged and older adults completing resistance training
Intervention and comparator
trials and pooled evidence
Measured outcome
lean tissue, strength and bone or muscle imaging
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

Creatine added to resistance training may improve some strength measures—not longevity

Measured outcome: lean tissue, strength and bone or muscle imaging

Released evidence conclusion: Pooled short trials found modest lean-mass and strength gains, while a related one-year analysis found no additional benefit.

Does not establish: It does not show that creatine alone preserves independence, prevents falls or fractures, improves cognition, extends healthspan, reduces mortality or lengthens life. The featured trials do not establish safety for people with kidney disease, complex medication use or frailty, and they do not justify a personal dose or product choice.

Registry link checked · projected from fifth-coverage-edition.json

Exercise has strong evidence for function—not proof of slower biological aging

exercise — NCT01072500

NCT01072500

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-07-31
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Older adults across community, clinical and mobility-limited populations
Intervention and comparator
mature randomized evidence
Measured outcome
mobility, function, frailty, falls and all-cause mortality
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why these stories are connected

Exercise has strong evidence for function—not proof of slower biological aging

Measured outcome: mobility, function, frailty, falls and all-cause mortality

Released evidence conclusion: Human trials support mobility and physical function in defined populations. Lifespan and biological-age claims require separate evidence.

Does not establish: Exercise trials prove that exercise slows biological aging for everyone.

Structured physical activity reduced late-life mobility disability—not aging itself

Measured outcome: mobility disability and discharge function

Released evidence conclusion: LIFE supports a meaningful mobility outcome in vulnerable older adults, while lifespan and universal-program claims remain untested.

Does not establish: It does not show that one modality is best, that more activity is always better, or that the studied programs increase lifespan. The LIFE intervention did not significantly reduce death or hospitalization. The hospital trial does not establish prevention of disability after discharge. Population-level trial results cannot safely select an individual program for someone with frailty, falls, cardiovascular symptoms or an acute illness.

Registry link checked · projected from first-coverage-pilot.json, fourth-coverage-edition.json

Resveratrol has a longevity reputation. Human trials tell a mixed story

resveratrol — NCT01150955

NCT01150955

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Healthy overweight older adults, obese men, older exercising men and men with metabolic syndrome
Intervention and comparator
small heterogeneous trials
Measured outcome
memory tests, metabolic markers, body composition, inflammation and exercise adaptation
Funding and conflicts
Mixed investigator, public, and public-private support; some study products were manufacturer supplied.

Why this story is connected

Resveratrol has a longevity reputation. Human trials tell a mixed story

Measured outcome: memory tests, metabolic markers, body composition, inflammation and exercise adaptation

Released evidence conclusion: One small memory-test signal sits beside several null or unfavorable metabolic trials; human evidence does not show longer life or healthspan.

Does not establish: The studies do not demonstrate that resveratrol prevents dementia, cardiovascular disease, frailty, disability, or death. They do not establish an effective anti-aging dose or prove that commercial products match the preparations used.

Registry link checked · projected from seventh-coverage-edition.json

Shingles vaccines prevent shingles. Dementia evidence remains non-randomized

shingles vaccine — NCT01165177

NCT01165177

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Adults age 50 or older in ZOE-50 plus older vaccine-eligible cohorts in two dementia analyses
Intervention and comparator
randomized and non-randomized evidence
Measured outcome
herpes-zoster disease and recorded dementia diagnoses
Funding and conflicts
GSK funded ZOE-50. The recombinant-dementia EHR study had NIHR/Wellcome/JDRF support and disclosed one author's GSK consultancy and Oxford–GSK role; GSK was reported uninvolved. The Welsh study reported public and philanthropic grants and no competing interests.

Why this story is connected

Shingles vaccines prevent shingles. Dementia evidence remains non-randomized

Measured outcome: herpes-zoster disease and recorded dementia diagnoses

Released evidence conclusion: Randomized trials established shingles prevention. Dementia findings come from observational and quasi-experimental studies and do not prove prevention.

Does not establish: It does not establish that Shingrix prevents dementia, that live and recombinant vaccines work identically, that avoiding a diagnosis equals avoiding disease, or that vaccination slows biological aging, increases healthspan or extends life.

Registry link checked · projected from tenth-coverage-edition.json

“Omega-3” is not one intervention—and the trial results do not transfer

omega-3 — NCT01169259

NCT01169259

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Primary-prevention adults, older adults after myocardial infarction and statin-treated high-risk adults with elevated triglycerides
Intervention and comparator
formulation-specific randomized trials
Measured outcome
cardiovascular composites and components, mortality, atrial fibrillation and bleeding
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why these stories are connected

“Omega-3” is not one intervention—and the trial results do not transfer

Measured outcome: cardiovascular composites and components, mortality, atrial fibrillation and bleeding

Released evidence conclusion: Two mixed EPA+DHA trials were neutral on primary outcomes; prescription icosapent ethyl benefited a defined high-risk population with safety and comparator limits.

Does not establish: The trials do not show that eating more fish, taking any retail fish-oil product, combining EPA and DHA, or using prescription icosapent ethyl produces the same effect. They do not recommend a product, brand or dose for an individual.

Vitamin D is essential. VITAL still found no broad prevention benefit

Measured outcome: invasive cancer, major cardiovascular events and clinical fractures

Released evidence conclusion: In generally healthy adults, vitamin D3 did not significantly reduce invasive cancer, major cardiovascular events, or fractures; deficiency treatment is a different question.

Does not establish: VITAL does not show that vitamin D is useless, that nobody needs supplementation, or that a clinician should stop treating deficiency. It does not compare every dose, formulation, or high-risk subgroup.

Registry link checked · projected from seventh-coverage-edition.json, sixth-coverage-edition.json

SPRINT reduced cardiovascular events—not aging itself

blood pressure — NCT01206062

NCT01206062

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
9,361 adults age 50 or older at elevated cardiovascular risk, without diabetes or prior stroke
Intervention and comparator
large randomized trial
Measured outcome
cardiovascular events, mortality, adverse events and cognitive outcomes
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

SPRINT reduced cardiovascular events—not aging itself

Measured outcome: cardiovascular events, mortality, adverse events and cognitive outcomes

Released evidence conclusion: Intensive treatment lowered cardiovascular events and mortality in eligible high-risk adults, with more hypotension, electrolyte problems and kidney injury.

Does not establish: SPRINT does not define a safe target for every person, prove that lower is always better, or support changing medication without clinical supervision. It did not enroll people with diabetes or prior stroke and does not establish the same balance in frail, institutionalized or otherwise excluded populations.

Registry link checked · projected from sixth-coverage-edition.json

CPAP improved symptoms—not cardiovascular events in major trials

CPAP — NCT01335087

NCT01335087

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
2,717 adults with sleep apnea and cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease; 1,264 non-sleepy adults after acute coronary syndrome
Intervention and comparator
large randomized trials
Measured outcome
major cardiovascular events, sleepiness, symptoms and quality of life
Funding and conflicts
SAVE reported support from public agencies and Philips Respironics; ISAACC reported public and industry support. Treatment adherence and selected populations limit inference.

Why this story is connected

CPAP improved symptoms—not cardiovascular events in major trials

Measured outcome: major cardiovascular events, sleepiness, symptoms and quality of life

Released evidence conclusion: SAVE and ISAACC did not significantly reduce their primary cardiovascular outcomes; SAVE separately found symptom and quality-of-life benefits.

Does not establish: The trials do not show that CPAP is useless, that diagnosed OSA should go untreated, or that every cardiovascular subgroup has the same result. They also do not establish longer life or slower biological aging.

Registry link checked · projected from eleventh-coverage-edition.json

Resveratrol has a longevity reputation. Human trials tell a mixed story

resveratrol — NCT01364961

NCT01364961

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Healthy overweight older adults, obese men, older exercising men and men with metabolic syndrome
Intervention and comparator
small heterogeneous trials
Measured outcome
memory tests, metabolic markers, body composition, inflammation and exercise adaptation
Funding and conflicts
Mixed investigator, public, and public-private support; some study products were manufacturer supplied.

Why this story is connected

Resveratrol has a longevity reputation. Human trials tell a mixed story

Measured outcome: memory tests, metabolic markers, body composition, inflammation and exercise adaptation

Released evidence conclusion: One small memory-test signal sits beside several null or unfavorable metabolic trials; human evidence does not show longer life or healthspan.

Does not establish: The studies do not demonstrate that resveratrol prevents dementia, cardiovascular disease, frailty, disability, or death. They do not establish an effective anti-aging dose or prove that commercial products match the preparations used.

Registry link checked · projected from seventh-coverage-edition.json

Resveratrol has a longevity reputation. Human trials tell a mixed story

resveratrol — NCT01412645

NCT01412645

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Healthy overweight older adults, obese men, older exercising men and men with metabolic syndrome
Intervention and comparator
small heterogeneous trials
Measured outcome
memory tests, metabolic markers, body composition, inflammation and exercise adaptation
Funding and conflicts
Mixed investigator, public, and public-private support; some study products were manufacturer supplied.

Why this story is connected

Resveratrol has a longevity reputation. Human trials tell a mixed story

Measured outcome: memory tests, metabolic markers, body composition, inflammation and exercise adaptation

Released evidence conclusion: One small memory-test signal sits beside several null or unfavorable metabolic trials; human evidence does not show longer life or healthspan.

Does not establish: The studies do not demonstrate that resveratrol prevents dementia, cardiovascular disease, frailty, disability, or death. They do not establish an effective anti-aging dose or prove that commercial products match the preparations used.

Registry link checked · projected from seventh-coverage-edition.json

High-dose flu vaccine reduced influenza—not immune aging

influenza vaccine — NCT01427309

NCT01427309

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
31,989 adults age 65 or older at 126 U.S. and Canadian centers
Intervention and comparator
large randomized trial
Measured outcome
laboratory-confirmed influenza, immunogenicity and safety
Funding and conflicts
Sanofi funded the high-dose trial and had primary responsibility for design, monitoring, data collection, analysis and statistics.

Why this story is connected

High-dose flu vaccine reduced influenza—not immune aging

Measured outcome: laboratory-confirmed influenza, immunogenicity and safety

Released evidence conclusion: The randomized result was 1.4% versus 1.9% influenza across two seasons, not proof of immune rejuvenation or longer life.

Does not establish: It does not show that high-dose vaccine is always the best option, that higher antibody levels equal immune rejuvenation, or that the formulation reduces all-cause mortality, slows aging, increases healthspan or extends lifespan.

Registry link checked · projected from tenth-coverage-edition.json

“Omega-3” is not one intervention—and the trial results do not transfer

omega-3 — NCT01492361

NCT01492361

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Primary-prevention adults, older adults after myocardial infarction and statin-treated high-risk adults with elevated triglycerides
Intervention and comparator
formulation-specific randomized trials
Measured outcome
cardiovascular composites and components, mortality, atrial fibrillation and bleeding
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

“Omega-3” is not one intervention—and the trial results do not transfer

Measured outcome: cardiovascular composites and components, mortality, atrial fibrillation and bleeding

Released evidence conclusion: Two mixed EPA+DHA trials were neutral on primary outcomes; prescription icosapent ethyl benefited a defined high-risk population with safety and comparator limits.

Does not establish: The trials do not show that eating more fish, taking any retail fish-oil product, combining EPA and DHA, or using prescription icosapent ethyl produces the same effect. They do not recommend a product, brand or dose for an individual.

Registry link checked · projected from sixth-coverage-edition.json

Vitamin D is essential. VITAL still found no broad prevention benefit

vitamin D — NCT01704859

NCT01704859

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
25,871 generally healthy U.S. adults not selected for vitamin D deficiency, low bone mass or osteoporosis
Intervention and comparator
large randomized prevention trial
Measured outcome
invasive cancer, major cardiovascular events and clinical fractures
Funding and conflicts
Primarily NIH-funded; vitamin D was donated by Pharmavite.

Why this story is connected

Vitamin D is essential. VITAL still found no broad prevention benefit

Measured outcome: invasive cancer, major cardiovascular events and clinical fractures

Released evidence conclusion: In generally healthy adults, vitamin D3 did not significantly reduce invasive cancer, major cardiovascular events, or fractures; deficiency treatment is a different question.

Does not establish: VITAL does not show that vitamin D is useless, that nobody needs supplementation, or that a clinician should stop treating deficiency. It does not compare every dose, formulation, or high-risk subgroup.

Registry link checked · projected from seventh-coverage-edition.json

“Omega-3” is not one intervention—and the trial results do not transfer

omega-3 — NCT01841944

NCT01841944

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Primary-prevention adults, older adults after myocardial infarction and statin-treated high-risk adults with elevated triglycerides
Intervention and comparator
formulation-specific randomized trials
Measured outcome
cardiovascular composites and components, mortality, atrial fibrillation and bleeding
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

“Omega-3” is not one intervention—and the trial results do not transfer

Measured outcome: cardiovascular composites and components, mortality, atrial fibrillation and bleeding

Released evidence conclusion: Two mixed EPA+DHA trials were neutral on primary outcomes; prescription icosapent ethyl benefited a defined high-risk population with safety and comparator limits.

Does not establish: The trials do not show that eating more fish, taking any retail fish-oil product, combining EPA and DHA, or using prescription icosapent ethyl produces the same effect. They do not recommend a product, brand or dose for an individual.

Registry link checked · projected from sixth-coverage-edition.json

GlyNAC’s small trial cannot establish reversal of aging

GlyNAC — NCT01870193

NCT01870193

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-04
Results availabilityNo registry results postedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Very small sample of older adults
Intervention and comparator
very small randomized trial
Measured outcome
biomarkers and physical function
Funding and conflicts
The publication disclosed NIH/NIA grant R01AG041782 and a McNair Foundation philanthropic gift, stated that funders had no role, and declared no conflicts of interest. Those are reported disclosures rather than proof that all potential bias is absent.

Why this story is connected

GlyNAC’s small trial cannot establish reversal of aging

Measured outcome: biomarkers and physical function

Released evidence conclusion: A 16-week study randomized 24 older adults—12 per arm—and reported many biomarker and function measures. Its size, multiplicity and exploratory analyses do not prove that GlyNAC reverses aging or extends healthspan.

Does not establish: The trial does not establish reversal of biological aging, disease prevention, disability prevention, cognitive preservation, longer healthspan or longer life. Aging-hallmark analyses added after trial completion were explicitly exploratory.

Registry link checked · projected from fifteenth-coverage-edition.json

Statin evidence changes with age, risk and prevention setting

statins — NCT02099123

NCT02099123

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusActive, not recruitingChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityNo registry results postedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Adults age 70 or older across mixed primary- and secondary-prevention settings
Intervention and comparator
trials and pooled evidence
Measured outcome
coronary and vascular events, stroke, mortality, cognition and cancer follow-up
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

Statin evidence changes with age, risk and prevention setting

Measured outcome: coronary and vascular events, stroke, mortality, cognition and cancer follow-up

Released evidence conclusion: Evidence is clearer after vascular disease than for starting primary prevention after age 75, and it does not establish longer life.

Does not establish: The featured evidence does not show that everyone over 75 should start, stop or change a statin. It does not choose a medicine or dose, calculate an individual's cardiovascular risk, or resolve how frailty, medication burden, side effects and life expectancy should be weighed in care.

Registry link checked · projected from sixth-coverage-edition.json

A tailored Tai Ji Quan program reduced falls in one high-risk trial

therapeutically tailored Tai Ji Quan (TJQMBB) — NCT02287740

NCT02287740

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusUnknownChecked 2026-08-26
Results availabilityNot assessedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
670 community-dwelling adults age 70 years or older with a prior fall or impaired mobility
Intervention and comparator
single-blind three-arm randomized clinical trial; multimodal exercise and stretching
Measured outcome
incidence of falls during the six-month intervention
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

A tailored Tai Ji Quan program reduced falls in one high-risk trial

Measured outcome: incidence of falls during the six-month intervention

Released evidence conclusion: Falls numbered 152, 218 and 363; TJQMBB versus stretching IRR 0.42 (95% CI 0.31–0.56) and versus multimodal exercise 0.69 (0.52–0.94).

Does not establish: The trial did not test every tai chi class, institutionalized or broadly frail populations, permanent independence, healthspan or lifespan.

Registry link checked · projected from eighteenth-coverage-claim-map.json

Structured physical activity reduced late-life mobility disability—not aging itself

exercise — NCT02300896

NCT02300896

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-07-31
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Community-dwelling and hospitalized older adults, including mobility-limited participants
Intervention and comparator
randomized trials
Measured outcome
mobility disability and discharge function
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

Structured physical activity reduced late-life mobility disability—not aging itself

Measured outcome: mobility disability and discharge function

Released evidence conclusion: LIFE supports a meaningful mobility outcome in vulnerable older adults, while lifespan and universal-program claims remain untested.

Does not establish: It does not show that one modality is best, that more activity is always better, or that the studied programs increase lifespan. The LIFE intervention did not significantly reduce death or hospitalization. The hospital trial does not establish prevention of disability after discharge. Population-level trial results cannot safely select an individual program for someone with frailty, falls, cardiovascular symptoms or an acute illness.

Registry link checked · projected from fourth-coverage-edition.json

Metformin is established for diabetes—not for extending healthy human life

Metformin to Augment Strength Training Effective Response in Seniors (MASTERS)

NCT02308228

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-07-31
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phasenot applicableUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Healthy adults age 65 or older, including a 14-person crossover sample around age 70
Intervention and comparator
small trials
Measured outcome
muscle adaptation, metabolism and gene expression
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

Metformin is established for diabetes—not for extending healthy human life

Measured outcome: muscle adaptation, metabolism and gene expression

Released evidence conclusion: Small older-adult studies show mechanistic changes and a blunted hypertrophy signal, not healthspan or lifespan extension.

Does not establish: It does not show that metformin prevents aging or extends life in healthy people. It does not establish that an AMPK, mTOR, transcriptomic or glucose change improves how long or well someone lives. NCT03107884 currently studies short bed-rest and recovery outcomes; an “active, not recruiting” registry status with no posted results is operational information, not evidence of benefit. TAME should not be described as completed proof without a canonical result record.

Registry link checked · projected from third-coverage-edition.json

STRIDE did not significantly reduce serious fall injuries in primary care

nurse-led multifactorial fall-injury prevention — NCT02475850

NCT02475850

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusUnknownChecked 2026-08-26
Results availabilityNot assessedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
5,451 community-dwelling primary-care patients age 70 years or older at increased risk for serious fall injuries
Intervention and comparator
pragmatic cluster-randomized trial across 86 primary-care practices; enhanced usual care with falls-prevention information
Measured outcome
time to first adjudicated serious fall injury
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

STRIDE did not significantly reduce serious fall injuries in primary care

Measured outcome: time to first adjudicated serious fall injury

Released evidence conclusion: First serious fall-injury rates were 4.9 versus 5.3 per 100 person-years; HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.80–1.06), P=.25.

Does not establish: The trial did not establish a significant primary-outcome reduction, equivalence, longer independence, healthspan or lifespan.

Registry link checked · projected from eighteenth-coverage-claim-map.json

The MIND diet trial found no cognitive edge over its active control

MIND diet — NCT02817074

NCT02817074

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
604 adults age 65 or older without cognitive impairment, with family dementia history, overweight and a suboptimal diet
Intervention and comparator
randomized dietary trial
Measured outcome
global cognition and structural MRI measures
Funding and conflicts
National Institute on Aging funding; investigators disclosed donated foods and product support.

Why this story is connected

The MIND diet trial found no cognitive edge over its active control

Measured outcome: global cognition and structural MRI measures

Released evidence conclusion: Both groups improved with counseling and calorie restriction; the between-group cognitive difference was not significant and MRI measures were similar.

Does not establish: The trial did not test dementia prevention, independence, biological-age reversal, healthspan or lifespan. A null result also does not prove that no version of the dietary pattern can affect cognition in any population.

Registry link checked · projected from eighth-coverage-edition.json

NAD precursors raise some metabolites; human longevity benefits remain unproven

NAD biology — NCT02835664

NCT02835664

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusUnknownChecked 2026-07-31
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Mostly middle-aged or older adults with differing health profiles
Intervention and comparator
small trials
Measured outcome
metabolites, physiology and short-term function
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

NAD precursors raise some metabolites; human longevity benefits remain unproven

Measured outcome: metabolites, physiology and short-term function

Released evidence conclusion: Small trials show target engagement, not broad clinical, healthspan or lifespan benefit—and products and routes are not interchangeable.

Does not establish: It does not show that NR, NMN, niacin and intravenous NAD have equivalent effects, that raising a blood metabolite restores tissue aging, or that any featured product prevents dementia, frailty or death. Secondary or exploratory signals in small trials are not established benefits. Animal lifespan findings do not substitute for human outcomes.

Registry link checked · projected from fourth-coverage-edition.json

NAD precursors raise some metabolites; human longevity benefits remain unproven

NAD biology — NCT02921659

NCT02921659

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusUnknownChecked 2026-07-31
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Mostly middle-aged or older adults with differing health profiles
Intervention and comparator
small trials
Measured outcome
metabolites, physiology and short-term function
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

NAD precursors raise some metabolites; human longevity benefits remain unproven

Measured outcome: metabolites, physiology and short-term function

Released evidence conclusion: Small trials show target engagement, not broad clinical, healthspan or lifespan benefit—and products and routes are not interchangeable.

Does not establish: It does not show that NR, NMN, niacin and intravenous NAD have equivalent effects, that raising a blood metabolite restores tissue aging, or that any featured product prevents dementia, frailty or death. Secondary or exploratory signals in small trials are not established benefits. Animal lifespan findings do not substitute for human outcomes.

Registry link checked · projected from fourth-coverage-edition.json

Multivitamins moved some tests and aging clocks. What does that mean?

multivitamins — NCT03035201

NCT03035201

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Older adults in related telephone, web, clinic and blood-based COSMOS substudies
Intervention and comparator
correlated randomized substudies
Measured outcome
cognitive-test scores, word recall and DNA-methylation biomarkers
Funding and conflicts
NIH and other support; Pfizer Consumer Healthcare/Haleon supplied some pills and packaging.

Why this story is connected

Multivitamins moved some tests and aging clocks. What does that mean?

Measured outcome: cognitive-test scores, word recall and DNA-methylation biomarkers

Released evidence conclusion: COSMOS found small cognitive-test differences and modest movement in two DNA-methylation clocks; neither establishes dementia prevention or longer life.

Does not establish: The COSMOS reports do not demonstrate that a multivitamin prevents dementia, Alzheimer's disease, disability, loss of independence, hospitalization, or death. They do not show that every formulation produces the same result.

Registry link checked · projected from seventh-coverage-edition.json

Spermidine did not improve the trial’s primary memory outcome

wheat-germ spermidine extract — NCT03094546

NCT03094546

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-04
Results availabilityNo registry results postedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Older adults with subjective cognitive decline
Intervention and comparator
small randomized phase 2b trial
Measured outcome
memory and cognitive tests
Funding and conflicts
German federal and academic support was disclosed. Several authors reported equity, executive or advisory roles, patents, or former equity involving Longevity Labs GmbH, which also supported development of the spermidine-rich extract; the paper states that funders had no role in trial conduct or reporting.

Why this story is connected

Spermidine did not improve the trial’s primary memory outcome

Measured outcome: memory and cognitive tests

Released evidence conclusion: In the 12-month SmartAge trial, a wheat-germ spermidine extract did not improve the prespecified memory outcome or secondary outcomes. Exploratory signals do not establish dementia prevention or longer life.

Does not establish: The study does not show dementia prevention, cognitive rejuvenation, disability prevention, slower biological aging, longer healthspan or longer life. It also does not validate spermidine-rich diets or every retail supplement.

Registry link checked · projected from fifteenth-coverage-edition.json

Cold-water studies measure thermogenesis—not longer life

habitual winter swimming and cold challenge — NCT03095846

NCT03095846

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-03
Results availabilityNot assessedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Very small selected sample of young healthy men
Intervention and comparator
cross-sectional swimmer versus matched comparison group
Measured outcome
brown-fat activity and thermogenesis
Funding and conflicts
The cold-exposure study reported Czech public research support and no competing interests. Seven of eight winter swimmers also used sauna, and the small selected sample makes attribution and generalization especially uncertain.

Why this story is connected

Cold-water studies measure thermogenesis—not longer life

Measured outcome: brown-fat activity and thermogenesis

Released evidence conclusion: A small study of young male winter swimmers found physiology differences. It did not test disease, function, healthspan or lifespan, and it cannot show that cold exposure caused the findings.

Does not establish: It does not show disease prevention, better function, longer healthspan, lower mortality or longer life. It does not establish benefit in older adults and cannot separate winter swimming from sauna use, fitness, diet or other selection factors.

Registry link checked · projected from fourteenth-coverage-edition.json

Cold-water studies measure thermogenesis—not longer life

habitual winter swimming and cold challenge — NCT03096535

NCT03096535

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-03
Results availabilityNot assessedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Very small selected sample of young healthy men
Intervention and comparator
cross-sectional swimmer versus matched comparison group
Measured outcome
brown-fat activity and thermogenesis
Funding and conflicts
The cold-exposure study reported Czech public research support and no competing interests. Seven of eight winter swimmers also used sauna, and the small selected sample makes attribution and generalization especially uncertain.

Why this story is connected

Cold-water studies measure thermogenesis—not longer life

Measured outcome: brown-fat activity and thermogenesis

Released evidence conclusion: A small study of young male winter swimmers found physiology differences. It did not test disease, function, healthspan or lifespan, and it cannot show that cold exposure caused the findings.

Does not establish: It does not show disease prevention, better function, longer healthspan, lower mortality or longer life. It does not establish benefit in older adults and cannot separate winter swimming from sauna use, fitness, diet or other selection factors.

Registry link checked · projected from fourteenth-coverage-edition.json

Metformin is established for diabetes—not for extending healthy human life

Metformin to Prevent Inactivity-induced Loss of Muscle Health During Aging

NCT03107884

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusActive, not recruitingChecked 2026-08-27
Results availabilityNot assessedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseearly phase 1Unknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Healthy adults age 65 or older, including a 14-person crossover sample around age 70
Intervention and comparator
small trials
Measured outcome
muscle adaptation, metabolism and gene expression
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

Metformin is established for diabetes—not for extending healthy human life

Measured outcome: muscle adaptation, metabolism and gene expression

Released evidence conclusion: Small older-adult studies show mechanistic changes and a blunted hypertrophy signal, not healthspan or lifespan extension.

Does not establish: It does not show that metformin prevents aging or extends life in healthy people. It does not establish that an AMPK, mTOR, transcriptomic or glucose change improves how long or well someone lives. NCT03107884 currently studies short bed-rest and recovery outcomes; an “active, not recruiting” registry status with no posted results is operational information, not evidence of benefit. TAME should not be described as completed proof without a canonical result record.

Registry link checked · projected from third-coverage-edition.json

Hearing intervention did not slow cognitive decline across the full ACHIEVE trial

hearing — NCT03243422

NCT03243422

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
977 community-dwelling adults age 70–84 with untreated hearing loss
Intervention and comparator
randomized trial with subgroup signals
Measured outcome
three-year standardized global-cognition change
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

Hearing intervention did not slow cognitive decline across the full ACHIEVE trial

Measured outcome: three-year standardized global-cognition change

Released evidence conclusion: The three-year trial was null across its full cohort. Signals in higher-risk groups need confirmation and do not establish dementia prevention.

Does not establish: ACHIEVE does not show that hearing treatment prevents mild cognitive impairment or dementia, reverses brain aging, extends healthspan, or lengthens life. It does not establish which baseline risk profile would reliably predict cognitive benefit in routine care. A null cognition result also does not mean that clinically appropriate hearing care lacks communication, participation or quality-of-life value.

Registry link checked · projected from fifth-coverage-edition.json

Urolithin A missed both primary outcomes in older adults

urolithin A — NCT03283462

NCT03283462

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-04
Results availabilityNo registry results postedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Selected older adults with lower mitochondrial function
Intervention and comparator
small randomized trial
Measured outcome
walking distance, muscle endurance and ATP production
Funding and conflicts
The publication disclosed Amazentis employees, its founder and chief executive, board leadership, company shareholdings, and patent interests. That direct sponsor and intellectual-property involvement must remain visible alongside the short duration and selected study population.

Why this story is connected

Urolithin A missed both primary outcomes in older adults

Measured outcome: walking distance, muscle endurance and ATP production

Released evidence conclusion: ENERGIZE found no significant benefit for six-minute walk distance or maximal ATP production. Secondary endurance and biomarker signals remain preliminary and do not establish disability prevention or longer healthy life.

Does not establish: ENERGIZE does not show prevention of mobility disability, sarcopenia treatment, preserved independence, aging reversal, healthspan extension or lifespan extension. It does not validate pomegranate products, microbiome interventions or unrelated urolithin A supplements.

Registry link checked · projected from fifteenth-coverage-edition.json

Human time-restricted-eating trials show mixed short-term results—not slower aging

meal timing — NCT03393195

NCT03393195

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Adults with overweight or obesity in three trials lasting 12–14 weeks
Intervention and comparator
short randomized trials
Measured outcome
weight, body composition, visceral fat and cardiometabolic markers
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

Human time-restricted-eating trials show mixed short-term results—not slower aging

Measured outcome: weight, body composition, visceral fat and cardiometabolic markers

Released evidence conclusion: Different eating windows and comparators produced different weight and fat findings; none tested biological aging, healthspan or lifespan.

Does not establish: It does not show slower epigenetic or biological aging, fewer late-life disabilities, lower mortality or longer life. It does not establish long-term adherence or separate every effect of timing from spontaneous calorie reduction. These trials also do not supply a universally safe eating schedule for people with diabetes, eating disorders, pregnancy, frailty, medication timing needs or other medical contexts.

Registry link checked · projected from fifth-coverage-edition.json

Human time-restricted-eating trials show mixed short-term results—not slower aging

meal timing — NCT03459703

NCT03459703

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Adults with overweight or obesity in three trials lasting 12–14 weeks
Intervention and comparator
short randomized trials
Measured outcome
weight, body composition, visceral fat and cardiometabolic markers
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

Human time-restricted-eating trials show mixed short-term results—not slower aging

Measured outcome: weight, body composition, visceral fat and cardiometabolic markers

Released evidence conclusion: Different eating windows and comparators produced different weight and fat findings; none tested biological aging, healthspan or lifespan.

Does not establish: It does not show slower epigenetic or biological aging, fewer late-life disabilities, lower mortality or longer life. It does not establish long-term adherence or separate every effect of timing from spontaneous calorie reduction. These trials also do not supply a universally safe eating schedule for people with diabetes, eating disorders, pregnancy, frailty, medication timing needs or other medical contexts.

Registry link checked · projected from fifth-coverage-edition.json

Testosterone did not prevent fractures in TRAVERSE

testosterone — NCT03518034

NCT03518034

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-03
Results availabilityRegistry results postedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
5,204 TRAVERSE participants: middle-aged and older men with symptoms, repeatedly low testosterone and preexisting or high cardiovascular risk
Intervention and comparator
randomized trials
Measured outcome
clinical fractures and bone-density measures
Funding and conflicts
TRAVERSE was an FDA-required postmarketing trial funded by an industry consortium led by AbbVie; sponsor and investigator roles require visible disclosure. The Testosterone Trials were principally publicly supported, with study product and additional support disclosed by investigators; the trials were not large or long enough for broad safety conclusions.

Why these stories are connected

Testosterone did not prevent fractures in TRAVERSE

Measured outcome: clinical fractures and bone-density measures

Released evidence conclusion: Clinical fractures were more frequent with testosterone than placebo in TRAVERSE; a smaller substudy’s bone-density gain cannot substitute for fracture outcomes.

Does not establish: The analysis does not establish why fractures were higher, identify a causal pathway, or show the same result for every formulation and population. It does not erase appropriate treatment for diagnosed conditions or provide an individual risk estimate.

TRAVERSE found cardiovascular noninferiority—not a longevity benefit

Measured outcome: major cardiovascular events and cardiovascular safety outcomes

Released evidence conclusion: Among selected men with hypogonadism and elevated cardiovascular risk, testosterone gel was noninferior to placebo for major cardiovascular events; the trial did not test longer life or general anti-aging use.

Does not establish: The result does not prove cardiovascular benefit, overall safety, safety beyond the observed follow-up, or applicability to men without symptoms and repeated low measurements. It does not apply automatically to injections, pellets, oral products, compounded products, bodybuilding use or supraphysiologic dosing.

Registry link checked · projected from twelfth-coverage-edition.json

Semaglutide reduced cardiovascular events in SELECT—not aging

GLP-1 drugs — NCT03574597

NCT03574597

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-07-31
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
17,604 adults age 45 or older with overweight or obesity and established cardiovascular disease, without diabetes
Intervention and comparator
large randomized trial
Measured outcome
major cardiovascular events and safety
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

Semaglutide reduced cardiovascular events in SELECT—not aging

Measured outcome: major cardiovascular events and safety

Released evidence conclusion: The randomized result and approved indication are population-specific; anti-aging, healthspan and lifespan claims were not tested.

Does not establish: It does not show that semaglutide makes healthy people live longer, reverses a biological clock, preserves every component of lean tissue, or should be used outside an approved or clinically justified indication. Body-composition changes are not equivalent to frailty, healthspan or lifespan. Results for one molecule, formulation and population do not automatically transfer to every GLP-1–based drug.

Registry link checked · projected from fourth-coverage-edition.json

Statin evidence changes with age, risk and prevention setting

statins — NCT04262206

NCT04262206

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusRecruitingChecked 2026-08-27
Results availabilityNo registry results postedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phasephase 4Unknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Adults age 70 or older across mixed primary- and secondary-prevention settings
Intervention and comparator
trials and pooled evidence
Measured outcome
coronary and vascular events, stroke, mortality, cognition and cancer follow-up
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

Statin evidence changes with age, risk and prevention setting

Measured outcome: coronary and vascular events, stroke, mortality, cognition and cancer follow-up

Released evidence conclusion: Evidence is clearer after vascular disease than for starting primary prevention after age 75, and it does not establish longer life.

Does not establish: The featured evidence does not show that everyone over 75 should start, stop or change a statin. It does not choose a medicine or dose, calculate an individual's cardiovascular risk, or resolve how frailty, medication burden, side effects and life expectancy should be weighed in care.

Registry link checked · projected from sixth-coverage-edition.json

PEARL trial found no change in its main visceral-fat outcome

rapamycin — NCT04488601

NCT04488601

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-07-31
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phasephase 2Unknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
129 adults age 50–85 enrolled; 114 completers included in the published analysis
Intervention and comparator
small randomized trial
Measured outcome
visceral fat, body composition, biomarkers, surveys and safety
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

PEARL trial found no change in its main visceral-fat outcome

Measured outcome: visceral fat, body composition, biomarkers, surveys and safety

Released evidence conclusion: The 48-week randomized trial reported a null primary outcome, exploratory signals and substantial limits on broader healthy-aging claims.

Does not establish: The PEARL trial shows rapamycin extends healthy-human lifespan.

Registry link checked · projected from first-coverage-pilot.json

Multivitamins moved some tests and aging clocks. What does that mean?

multivitamins — NCT04582617

NCT04582617

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Older adults in related telephone, web, clinic and blood-based COSMOS substudies
Intervention and comparator
correlated randomized substudies
Measured outcome
cognitive-test scores, word recall and DNA-methylation biomarkers
Funding and conflicts
NIH and other support; Pfizer Consumer Healthcare/Haleon supplied some pills and packaging.

Why this story is connected

Multivitamins moved some tests and aging clocks. What does that mean?

Measured outcome: cognitive-test scores, word recall and DNA-methylation biomarkers

Released evidence conclusion: COSMOS found small cognitive-test differences and modest movement in two DNA-methylation clocks; neither establishes dementia prevention or longer life.

Does not establish: The COSMOS reports do not demonstrate that a multivitamin prevents dementia, Alzheimer's disease, disability, loss of independence, hospitalization, or death. They do not show that every formulation produces the same result.

Registry link checked · projected from seventh-coverage-edition.json

NAD precursors raise some metabolites; human longevity benefits remain unproven

NAD biology — NCT04823260

NCT04823260

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-07-31
Results availabilityNot assessedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Mostly middle-aged or older adults with differing health profiles
Intervention and comparator
small trials
Measured outcome
metabolites, physiology and short-term function
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

NAD precursors raise some metabolites; human longevity benefits remain unproven

Measured outcome: metabolites, physiology and short-term function

Released evidence conclusion: Small trials show target engagement, not broad clinical, healthspan or lifespan benefit—and products and routes are not interchangeable.

Does not establish: It does not show that NR, NMN, niacin and intravenous NAD have equivalent effects, that raising a blood metabolite restores tissue aging, or that any featured product prevents dementia, frailty or death. Secondary or exploratory signals in small trials are not established benefits. Animal lifespan findings do not substitute for human outcomes.

Registry link checked · projected from fourth-coverage-edition.json

RSV vaccines reduce respiratory disease. Separate trials cannot rank them

RSV vaccines — NCT04886596

NCT04886596

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Adults age 60 or older across three separate pivotal vaccine trials
Intervention and comparator
three randomized vaccine trials
Measured outcome
RSV lower-respiratory disease or illness, acute respiratory disease and safety
Funding and conflicts
The Arexvy, Abrysvo and mResvia pivotal trials were funded by GSK, Pfizer and Moderna, respectively; current guidance and postauthorization safety context come from CDC and FDA.

Why this story is connected

RSV vaccines reduce respiratory disease. Separate trials cannot rank them

Measured outcome: RSV lower-respiratory disease or illness, acute respiratory disease and safety

Released evidence conclusion: Arexvy, Abrysvo and mResvia each reduced a trial-defined RSV respiratory endpoint, but separate protocols cannot establish a product ranking.

Does not establish: It does not show that one product is universally best, that efficacy percentages can be compared without protocol context, that vaccination should be repeated annually, or that preventing RSV disease restores an aging immune system, increases healthspan or lengthens life.

Registry link checked · projected from tenth-coverage-edition.json

RSV vaccines reduce respiratory disease. Separate trials cannot rank them

RSV vaccines — NCT05035212

NCT05035212

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusActive, not recruitingChecked 2026-08-27
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phasephase 3Unknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Adults age 60 or older across three separate pivotal vaccine trials
Intervention and comparator
three randomized vaccine trials
Measured outcome
RSV lower-respiratory disease or illness, acute respiratory disease and safety
Funding and conflicts
The Arexvy, Abrysvo and mResvia pivotal trials were funded by GSK, Pfizer and Moderna, respectively; current guidance and postauthorization safety context come from CDC and FDA.

Why this story is connected

RSV vaccines reduce respiratory disease. Separate trials cannot rank them

Measured outcome: RSV lower-respiratory disease or illness, acute respiratory disease and safety

Released evidence conclusion: Arexvy, Abrysvo and mResvia each reduced a trial-defined RSV respiratory endpoint, but separate protocols cannot establish a product ranking.

Does not establish: It does not show that one product is universally best, that efficacy percentages can be compared without protocol context, that vaccination should be repeated annually, or that preventing RSV disease restores an aging immune system, increases healthspan or lengthens life.

Registry link checked · projected from tenth-coverage-edition.json

RSV vaccines reduce respiratory disease. Separate trials cannot rank them

RSV vaccines — NCT05127434

NCT05127434

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-02
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Adults age 60 or older across three separate pivotal vaccine trials
Intervention and comparator
three randomized vaccine trials
Measured outcome
RSV lower-respiratory disease or illness, acute respiratory disease and safety
Funding and conflicts
The Arexvy, Abrysvo and mResvia pivotal trials were funded by GSK, Pfizer and Moderna, respectively; current guidance and postauthorization safety context come from CDC and FDA.

Why this story is connected

RSV vaccines reduce respiratory disease. Separate trials cannot rank them

Measured outcome: RSV lower-respiratory disease or illness, acute respiratory disease and safety

Released evidence conclusion: Arexvy, Abrysvo and mResvia each reduced a trial-defined RSV respiratory endpoint, but separate protocols cannot establish a product ranking.

Does not establish: It does not show that one product is universally best, that efficacy percentages can be compared without protocol context, that vaccination should be repeated annually, or that preventing RSV disease restores an aging immune system, increases healthspan or lengthens life.

Registry link checked · projected from tenth-coverage-edition.json

Human time-restricted-eating trials show mixed short-term results—not slower aging

meal timing — NCT05310721

NCT05310721

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusCompletedChecked 2026-08-01
Results availabilityPeer-reviewed publication linkedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phaseunknownUnknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
Adults with overweight or obesity in three trials lasting 12–14 weeks
Intervention and comparator
short randomized trials
Measured outcome
weight, body composition, visceral fat and cardiometabolic markers
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

Human time-restricted-eating trials show mixed short-term results—not slower aging

Measured outcome: weight, body composition, visceral fat and cardiometabolic markers

Released evidence conclusion: Different eating windows and comparators produced different weight and fat findings; none tested biological aging, healthspan or lifespan.

Does not establish: It does not show slower epigenetic or biological aging, fewer late-life disabilities, lower mortality or longer life. It does not establish long-term adherence or separate every effect of timing from spontaneous calorie reduction. These trials also do not supply a universally safe eating schedule for people with diabetes, eating disorders, pregnancy, frailty, medication timing needs or other medical contexts.

Registry link checked · projected from fifth-coverage-edition.json

Partial-reprogramming trial is testing eye-treatment safety—not human rejuvenation

partial reprogramming — NCT07290244

NCT07290244

Registry identity and operations are shown separately from the linked article’s evidence conclusion.

Operational statusRecruitingChecked 2026-08-27
Results availabilityNo registry results postedPublication and registry results are different records.
Registered phasephase 1Unknown and not applicable remain distinct.
Population
18 adults age 40–85 with glaucoma or recent non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (planned enrollment)
Intervention and comparator
no results yet
Measured outcome
planned safety, dose-limiting toxicity, laboratory and eye measures; no posted results
Funding and conflicts
Funding and conflict context is source-reviewed in the linked article; registry sponsorship alone is not evidence of benefit.

Why this story is connected

Partial-reprogramming trial is testing eye-treatment safety—not human rejuvenation

Measured outcome: planned safety, dose-limiting toxicity, laboratory and eye measures; no posted results

Released evidence conclusion: A recruiting Phase 1 eye study asks whether ER-100 can be administered safely. It has no posted human efficacy results and does not test lifespan.

Does not establish: ER-100 has demonstrated human rejuvenation.

Registry link checked · projected from first-coverage-pilot.json

Method and limits

One registry identity, once.

Records are deduplicated by canonical registry ID from the governed source sets behind released stories. Registry links were rechecked on August 27, 2026. Completed status is retained as stable; changing active records were rechecked. Unknown fields remain unknown. Posted registry results are not silently treated as peer-reviewed publications.