Research Analysis · Falls & independence

STRIDE did not significantly reduce serious fall injuries in primary care

In 5,451 older adults at increased fall-injury risk, a nurse-led multifactorial strategy did not significantly reduce the first adjudicated serious fall injury versus enhanced usual care. A secondary self-reported fall-injury outcome differed.

Evidence scope

What this trial can—and cannot—show

Population or model
5,451 community-dwelling primary-care patients age 70 years or older at increased risk for serious fall injuries
Design
pragmatic cluster-randomized trial across 86 primary-care practices
Comparator
enhanced usual care with falls-prevention information
Duration
24 to 44 months of participant follow-up
Primary outcome
time to first adjudicated serious fall injury
Evidence maturity
Human serious fall injuries · large pragmatic cluster-randomized trial
Funding & conflicts
PCORI and the National Institute on Aging supported STRIDE. The public report lists the participating institutions and investigators; no linked correction or retraction affecting the central result was identified.
Safety & status
Hospitalizations and deaths were similar. The secondary first self-reported fall-injury result does not replace the adjudicated primary outcome.

Bottom line: First serious fall-injury rates were 4.9 versus 5.3 per 100 person-years; HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.80–1.06), P=.25.

Not established: The trial did not establish a significant primary-outcome reduction, equivalence, longer independence, healthspan or lifespan.

Abstract paper-cut illustration of two coordinated primary-care pathways converging on a restrained outcome marker.
Editorial illustration. Parallel care pathways and a measured endpoint. This editorial illustration is not scientific evidence and does not depict a measured result, prevented injury, or a treatment recommendation. Credit: MoreYears.news editorial · original AI-assisted illustration

The primary result comes first

STRIDE tested whether a nurse-led, individually tailored multifactorial strategy worked when embedded in routine primary care. The rate of first adjudicated serious fall injury was numerically lower, but the confidence interval crossed no difference and the comparison was not statistically significant.

A secondary outcome differed

Time to first self-reported fall injury favored the intervention, with a hazard ratio of 0.90 and a 99% confidence interval of 0.83 to 0.99. Because this was secondary and self-reported, it cannot replace the blinded adjudicated primary result.

Who the result fits

Participants were community dwelling, age 70 or older and screened as being at increased risk. The sample was more educated and less racially diverse than the wider population, included few people with substantial cognitive impairment and did not include small independent practices.

What remains uncertain

The study did not fully establish intervention fidelity across sites. It did not show clinically meaningful improvements across most well-being measures, and it did not test whether the strategy extended independence or life.

Sources and editorial method

Three research passes were completed before prose drafting. Every substantive statement maps to F71-STRIDE-01, F71-STRIDE-02, F71-STRIDE-03, F71-STRIDE-04 in the frozen evidence record. Primary identifiers, registry status, correction state, Funding and conflicts, safety context and limitations were reverified. See issue #144.

AI disclosure: AI-assisted research and drafting were used within the governed workflow; sources and claims were checked against the frozen evidence map. This article is educational and not medical advice.

Explore more evidence on health and independence

More on the outcomes that shape healthy aging

A related randomized fall-prevention trial with a different outcome boundary

Research AnalysisHealth & function

LiFE reduced self-reported falls by embedding activity in daily routines

Among 317 selected older adults at high risk of falls, the LiFE program integrated balance and strength activities into everyday routines and reduced the self-reported fall rate versus sham gentle exercise over 12 months.

Evidence scopeHuman self-reported falls and function · small randomized trial

Another fall-prevention comparison with distinct population and delivery limits

Research AnalysisHealth & function

A tailored Tai Ji Quan program reduced falls in one high-risk trial

In 670 selected community-dwelling older adults at high risk of falling, a therapeutically tailored Tai Ji Quan program reduced falls over 24 weeks versus stretching and multimodal exercise.

Evidence scopeHuman fall incidence · three-arm randomized trial

Publication history

Published August 26, 2026 after three documented research passes, claim-level evidence review and deterministic source checks. No correction or retraction affecting the central result was identified at publication.