MoreYears trust center
Correct the record without erasing the trail.
Longevity evidence changes, and reporting can be wrong or incomplete. Material corrections should be visible, dated, and specific about what changed and why.
Material changes
Preserve the history readers need.
A consequential scientific claim should not be silently overwritten. The article’s record should explain the change in context.
Date it.
Record when the correction or material update was made.
Name it.
Identify the statement, source, interpretation, or disclosure that changed.
Explain it.
State why the change was necessary and what the corrected record now says.
Preserve it.
Keep material revision history available instead of removing the trail.
Different kinds of change
Not every edit means the same thing.
The published record was materially wrong.
Correct factual, sourcing, numerical, attribution, or interpretive errors and explain the consequential change.
New evidence changed the picture.
Add a dated update when a study result, registry change, regulator action, or other primary record materially changes context.
The wording could mislead without being strictly false.
Clarify ambiguous language and state why the added precision matters when it affects interpretation.
Presentation changed without altering meaning.
Typographical, formatting, or accessibility fixes need not be elevated as scientific corrections when they do not change substance.
The policy is public; the intake workflow is not launched.
The site currently contains an editorial-format demonstration rather than regular news reports. A public error-reporting channel will be described only after a real, maintainable contact workflow exists. Until then, this page intentionally does not invent an email address, form backend, staff contact, service level, or response-time guarantee.
Trust center